Arizona flag Powell Gammill - 2004 Congressional Candidate - Arizona - District 2 - U.S. House of Representatives - Libertarian Gadsden Flag
Astronaut Melvill displays "SpaceShipOne, Government Zero!"

"One small step for man,
one giant leap for private enterprise!"

 

-- stated an anonymous Wise County, Va. space science advocate upon witnessing the landing of this privately funded space ship's maiden voyage. (SpaceShipOne, June 21, 2004)

    The Space Economy

  When Peter Diamandis was a little boy, he dreamed of going to the stars.  He even worked hard to prepare himself to become an astronaut.  But when he was able to talk to a real astronaut, he was given the strait truth.  Only one in a thousand are selected, and even then only half of those selected actually get to go.  That a government astronaut must follow strict rules, behavior, and requirements to make it into space.  Dr.  Diamandis did not like those odds, nor the required subservient behavior mandated, and knew he would have to become a different animal if he was to go to space.  He would have to become a private astronaut. 

Inspired by the heroics of Charles Lindbergh and the value of the Orteig Prize, which inspired aviators to try and cross the Atlantic Ocean alone in a plane for the first time, Peter Diamandis decided to gather some like minded friends (Mrs. Anousheh Ansari and Mr. Amir Anasari funded the award) and create a $10 million dollar prize.   The "
Anasari X-Prize," as it is designated, gave a ten year time limitation to anyone who could develop a space craft capable of  lofting three human  passengers to a suborbital flight into space and back, with a repeated flight in the same vehicle within two weeks, all without receiving any government money.   Nine years later the call is being answered by a couple of dozen enthusiastic companies.

Burt Rutan designed the worlds first operational private space vehicle, SpaceShipOne, whose first voyage into space has just occurred.  I was there to witness its maiden voyage into space.  I had composed and drawn a sign (with U.S. Senate candidate Ernest Hancock), that read "SpaceShipOne GovernmentZero."   When I was there Ernie went tearing off into the victory crowd with this sign.  Burt Rutan saw him holding it up, and ran over and asked if he could have the sign.  Ernie was more than happy to oblige.  Mr. Rutan handed the sign to the world's first private astronaut/pilot, Michael W. Melvill, seen above proudly holding the sign aloft.  Thank you Mr. Rutan, Mr. Allen and Mr. Melville for understanding the significance of what your company has accomplished.  As Ernie put it, "We are going to the stars, and government is not invited."

Government had nothing to do with this accomplishment.  For $20 million dollars, from billionaire Paul Allen, we have one space faring company on the map and because of the X-Prize several other daring dreamers are ready to begin testing their ideas on how to get into space.  These will be heady times ahead.  But remember, government did nothing to support this effort, in fact, government was a hindrance.  Government is always a hindrance.

Lets look at NASA's record.  For the cost of one of their studies, a private company put a man into space, and safely returned him, in a reusable vehicle with room for two more passengers.  In addition, this $20 million, has bought a series of test bed systems, simulators, and well designed flight training tools, which will lead to further enhancements: bigger ships with more passengers which lowers prices, and higher altitudes, to eventually achieve orbit, and then to leave the planet.  And this was just a manned private space program.  The unmanned space launches in this country have been destroyed by government licensing, fines, regulations and rules.  We are putting men into space privately, at a time when the government no longer can.  But at the same time, we have companies fleeing the USA for foreign shores to do unmanned payload launches.  Even then, the US government and NASA apply pressure on foreign nations to prevent such free enterprise from being launched on their shores (and competing with the US government).

What has NASA given us lately?  I mean, within the last quarter of a century?  We have had beautiful satellite systems, and space probes that either must be launched by other nations, or fail to either reach their targets, or fail to work when they arrive at their destination.  Okay, bad things happen in space.  But there has been a litany of failures, from the death of a real space station, Skylab and the problems of the Hubbell space telescope onward, that were due to utter incompetence.  There have been some amazing missions and heroic fixes as well.  But stupidity should not be rewarded. 

And a government space program is always narrowly limited to political objectives and gains.  Real scientific knowledge is never a justification for a mission, except as a sop to the public.  And pathetic uses of space for business (large defense contractors) is the rule.  Let the free market wonder if space provides an answer, and they will come.  Let government propose the uses of space for enterprise, and companies will sit back and let the taxpayers assume the risks, since a subsidized enterprise cannot be competed with on a equal stage.

Instead, we watch manned government space missions (in pathetic low earth orbit) performing "science" experiments conceived by children (on virtually every mission), which are not science, nor worth the risks, and the millions of dollars and time invested.  The so called "International space station" is a money wasting boondoggle, decades behind schedule, and billions in the red.  Not to mention, it is a pathetic space station in the first place.  Skylab, which NASA would rather forget existed, was a real honest to god space station.  Whose size dwarfs all other space stations (like Mir
now privately owned) combined.  And Congress, ever the mindful stewards of your wallet, let Skylab  burn up, rather than building off of it. 

Worse yet, twenty years ago, private unmanned space companies were forming in California, New Mexico, Texas and Florida.  Such systems would be much simpler than manned launches, and had a ready market:  satellite launches.  NASA seeing competition with their new shuttle, brought the pressure of the FAA and Congress to kill off the private unmanned space programs.  They have even gone so far as to pressure other countries into pulling back on how many private launches they would allow, and under no circumstances allow American companies to form and launch in these countries.  When Challenger blew up, the USA was suddenly without a viable means of launching satellites, and we saw the humiliation of needing the Soviets to launch satellite and planetary space missions, in addition to our Air Force having to scramble to build its own unmanned launch capability.

It is time to let private companies, and private charities (i.e., foundations) take over the exploration and exploitation of space.  Government programs cost too much,  produce too little and have no long term goals other than protecting the government space program.  Let those with a vested interest risk their time, money and lives.  Let the market place decide, if their efforts were worth it.  And leave government behind on Earth the shrivel on the vine.

Thank you X-prize!  The future is so bright, . . .  I have to wear shades.

Home

Western Libertarian AllianceThe L-Factor

Powell Gammill © 2004